Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, your all-in-one tool for test automation. Perform end-to-end testing on desktop, web and mobile platforms using real devices or emulators/simulators. Automate even challenging interfaces such as ERP and legacy applications. Run tests in parallel or distribute them on a Selenium Grid. Ranorex is easy for beginners with a codeless click-and-go interface, but powerful for automation experts with a full IDE, and integrates with leading automation tools. Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio is your complete toolset to accelerate end-to-end testing for desktop, web and mobile applications. Learn more about Ranorex StudioAccelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, your all-in-one tool for test automation. Perform end-to-end testing on desktop, web and mobile platforms using real devices or emulators/simulators. Automate even challenging interfaces such as ERP and legacy applications. Run tests in parallel or distribute them on a Selenium Grid. Ranorex is easy for beginners with a codeless click-and-go interface, but powerful for automation experts with a full IDE, and integrates with leading automation tools.
Automate Everything
![Automated software testing tools comparison Automated software testing tools comparison](/uploads/1/2/3/7/123729261/765296658.png)
Rapise helps you test it all: web, mobile, desktop, & APIs. Rapise doesn’t just test, it understands. And it will help you manage tests spanning multiple technologies at once.
![Automated Software Testing Tools Automated Software Testing Tools](https://www.tricentis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Tricentis-is-a-Leader-in-The-Forrester-Wave.gif)
Automation For Everyone
Using Rapise, anyone can automate. Rapise records your tests, then lets you edit them in its easy-to-use spreadsheet-based editor. Or you can dig into our JavaScript-based engine that’s a breeze to extend.
Feature Highlights
Scriptless Automation
Rapise help you create the right tests fast. Powerful features like record once, playback in any browser, and live validation during recording make recording straightforward. With Rapise, test maintenance is simple: features like scriptless keep tests human readable.
Microsoft Dynamics and Salesforce
When you need complex business applications like Microsoft Dynamics and Salesforce tested and validated, look to Rapise. Rapise includes out of the box support for Dynamics AX, CRM, NAV and 365, as well as Salesforce Classic and Lightning.
Robust Automation
Object-based approach lets you create and refine tests using drag and drop. As the application updates, so will the objects: no fiddling required. Keyword and> Rapise datasheet: main features and capabilties
Useful Links
- Pricing
- Evaluation Guides
- Documentation
- Feature Checklist
- FAQ
- System Requirements
- Add-Ons and Downloads
- Cloud Hosting
Further Reading
- 10 Features Every Codeless Test Automation Tool Should Offer
- What is Automated Software Testing?
- What is Graphic User Interface (GUI) Testing?
- What is API Testing?
- Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with Rapise
I believe, and always try to explore other tools and techniques to find what more we can have to put in test automation. There are various feature that these tool carries with it and we should be aware of them, Wherever applicable we should try to use the other tools rather stick to the one or two specific tools.
However there are many great tools available, I have listed the commonly used five best test automation tools. If you know or have worked on any other tool than these please let us know. Share your experiences with these tools or any other via comments.
Telerik Test Studio
Telerik TestStudiois the easiest software testing tool you’ve tried – watch a couple of videos and you are ready to go. Navigate, point and click is all it takes to generate even the most complex of your functional, performance and load tests. It is an all in one testing software for functional, load, performance and mobile app testing. The in-depth functional testing includes native web and desktop apps testing along with mobile and tablet apps, HTML5, AJAX, Silverlight and WPF apps testing. Additionally testing teams can rely on the product to test JavaScript calls, Telerik controls, dynamic page synchronization, client-side behaviors, UI virtualizations and XAML animations. This software testing tool streamlines teamwork by introducing a common platform for testers and developers to work together. It ships with a standalone app and a Visual Studio plug-in that use the same repositories and file formats.
HP Unified Functional Testing Software
(Formerly HP QuickTest Professional)
A single solution for testing GUIs, APIs and multi layer applications
HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) software is an automated software testing solution addressing the challenges of constant change in technology and processes. Automation testing is a leap forward in modern applications, and it can dramatically improve software quality while cutting testing costs and complexity even in the most rapidly changing environments. And with its integration with HP Application Lifecycle Management, it significantly enhances developer and tester productivity and collaboration.
Download Free Trial
Automated Software Testing Tools Comparison
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That’s it. What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Streaming eyeshield 21 subtitle indonesia. Selenium has the support of some of the largest browser vendors who have taken (or are taking) steps to make Selenium a native part of their browser. It is also the core technology in countless other browser automation tools, APIs and frameworks.
TestComplete
TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobile, web and desktop applications. Create accurate and repeatable automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments quickly and easily – whether you are a complete beginner or an experienced automation engineer.
When testing today’s modern applications, it’s important that your tools are as agile and flexible as you need to be. TestComplete has the ability to script in multiple languages, supports modern control sets and integrates with popular open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins. By giving you the ability to reuse tests across different devices, platforms and environments, TestComplete can significantly increase delivery speed, while helping save costs.
Under pressure to increase quality in faster release cycles? No problem. With TestComplete, you can create, manage and run tests for any mobile, web, or desktop software.
Know more about TestComplete
Watir
Watir, pronounced water, is an open-source (BSD) family of Ruby libraries for automating web browsers. It allows you to write tests that are easy to read and maintain. It is simple and flexible.
Watir drives browsers the same way people do. It clicks links, fills in forms, presses buttons. Watir also checks results, such as whether expected text appears on the page.
Watir will drive web applications that are served up as HTML pages in a web browser. Watir will not work with ActiveX plugin components, Java Applets, Macromedia Flash, or other plugin applications. To determine whether Watir can be used to automate a part of a web application, right click on the object and see if the View Source menu option is available. If you can view the HTML source, that object can be automated using Watir.
Like other programming languages, Ruby gives you the power to connect to databases, read data files and spreadsheets, export XML, and structure your code as reusable libraries. Unlike other programming languages, Ruby is concise and often a joy to read.
Hello Saket I am looking for the best automation tools to test forms which will be having barcodes on it and have to be decoded. It will be both paper and electronic forms mainly the tax forms.
Software development |
---|
Core activities |
Paradigms and models |
Methodologies and frameworks |
Supporting disciplines |
Practices |
Tools |
Standards and Bodies of Knowledge |
Glossaries |
In software testing, test automation is the use of software separate from the software being tested to control the execution of tests and the comparison of actual outcomes with predicted outcomes.[1] Test automation can automate some repetitive but necessary tasks in a formalized testing process already in place, or perform additional testing that would be difficult to do manually. Test automation is critical for continuous delivery and continuous testing.
There are many approaches to test automation, however below are the general approaches used widely:
- Graphical user interface testing. A testing framework that generates user interface events such as keystrokes and mouse clicks, and observes the changes that result in the user interface, to validate that the observable behavior of the program is correct.
- API driven testing. A testing framework that uses a programming interface to the application to validate the behaviour under test. Typically API driven testing bypasses application user interface altogether. It can also be testing public (usually) interfaces to classes, modules or libraries are tested with a variety of input arguments to validate that the results that are returned are correct.
One way to generate test cases automatically is model-based testing through use of a model of the system for test case generation, but research continues into a variety of alternative methodologies for doing so.[citation needed] In some cases, the model-based approach enables non-technical users to create automated business test cases in plain English so that no programming of any kind is needed in order to configure them for multiple operating systems, browsers, and smart devices.[2]
What to automate, when to automate, or even whether one really needs automation are crucial decisions which the testing (or development) team must make.[3] A multi-vocal literature review of 52 practitioner and 26 academic sources found that five main factors to consider in test automation decision are: 1) System Under Test (SUT), 2) the types and numbers of tests, 3) test-tool, 4) human and organizational topics, and 5) cross-cutting factors. The most frequent individual factors identified in the study were: need for regression testing, economic factors, and maturity of SUT.[4]
A growing trend in software development is the use of unit testing frameworks such as the xUnit frameworks (for example, JUnit and NUnit) that allow the execution of unit tests to determine whether various sections of the code are acting as expected under various circumstances. Test cases describe tests that need to be run on the program to verify that the program runs as expected.
Test automation, mostly using unit testing, is a key feature of extreme programming and agile software development, where it is known as test-driven development (TDD) or test-first development. Unit tests can be written to define the functionality before the code is written. However, these unit tests evolve and are extended as coding progresses, issues are discovered and the code is subjected to refactoring.[5] Only when all the tests for all the demanded features pass is the code considered complete. Proponents argue that it produces software that is both more reliable and less costly than code that is tested by manual exploration.[citation needed] It is considered more reliable because the code coverage is better, and because it is run constantly during development rather than once at the end of a waterfall development cycle. The developer discovers defects immediately upon making a change, when it is least expensive to fix. Finally, code refactoring is safer when unit testing is used; transforming the code into a simpler form with less code duplication, but equivalent behavior, is much less likely to introduce new defects when the refactored code is covered by unit tests.
Some software testing tasks (such as extensive low-level interface regression testing) can be laborious and time-consuming to do manually. In addition, a manual approach might not always be effective in finding certain classes of defects. Test automation offers a possibility to perform these types of testing effectively.
Once automated tests have been developed, they can be run quickly and repeatedly. Many times, this can be a cost-effective method for regression testing of software products that have a long maintenance life. Even minor patches over the lifetime of the application can cause existing features to break which were working at an earlier point in time.
Test automation tools can be expensive and are usually employed in combination with manual testing. Test automation can be made cost-effective in the long term, especially when used repeatedly in regression testing. A good candidate for test automation is a test case for common flow of an application, as it is required to be executed (regression testing) every time an enhancement is made in the application. Test automation reduces the effort associated with manual testing. Manual effort is needed to develop and maintain automated checks, as well as reviewing test results.
In automated testing, the test engineer or software quality assurance person must have software coding ability since the test cases are written in the form of source code which when run produce output according to the assertions that are a part of it. Some test automation tools allow for test authoring to be done by keywords instead of coding, which do not require programming.
- 4Framework approach in automation
API driven testing[edit]
API testing is also being widely used by software testers due to the difficulty of creating and maintaining GUI-based automation testing. It involves directly testing APIs as part of integration testing, to determine if they meet expectations for functionality, reliability, performance, and security.[6] Since APIs lack a GUI, API testing is performed at the message layer.[7] API testing is considered critical when an API serves as the primary interface to application logic since GUI tests can be difficult to maintain with the short release cycles and frequent changes commonly used with agile software development and DevOps.[8][9]
Continuous testing[edit]
Continuous testing is the process of executing automated tests as part of the software delivery pipeline to obtain immediate feedback on the business risks associated with a software release candidate.[10][11] For Continuous Testing, the scope of testing extends from validating bottom-up requirements or user stories to assessing the system requirements associated with overarching business goals.[12]
Graphical User Interface (GUI) testing[edit]
Many test automation tools provide record and playback features that allow users to interactively record user actions and replay them back any number of times, comparing actual results to those expected. The advantage of this approach is that it requires little or no software development. This approach can be applied to any application that has a graphical user interface. However, reliance on these features poses major reliability and maintainability problems. Relabelling a button or moving it to another part of the window may require the test to be re-recorded. Record and playback also often adds irrelevant activities or incorrectly records some activities.[citation needed]
A variation on this type of tool is for testing of web sites. Here, the 'interface' is the web page. However, such a framework utilizes entirely different techniques because it is rendering HTML and listening to DOM Events instead of operating system events. Headless browsers or solutions based on Selenium Web Driver are normally used for this purpose.[13][14][15]
Another variation of this type of test automation tool is for testing mobile applications. This is very useful given the number of different sizes, resolutions, and operating systems used on mobile phones. For this variation, a framework is used in order to instantiate actions on the mobile device and to gather results of the actions.[16][better source needed]
Another variation is script-less test automation that does not use record and playback, but instead builds a model[clarification needed] of the application and then enables the tester to create test cases by simply inserting test parameters and conditions, which requires no scripting skills.
Framework approach in automation[edit]
A test automation framework is an integrated system that sets the rules of automation of a specific product. This system integrates the function libraries, test data sources, object details and various reusable modules. These components act as small building blocks which need to be assembled to represent a business process. The framework provides the basis of test automation and simplifies the automation effort.
The main advantage of a framework of assumptions, concepts and tools that provide support for automated software testing is the low cost for maintenance. If there is change to any test case then only the test case file needs to be updated and the driver Script and startup script will remain the same. Ideally, there is no need to update the scripts in case of changes to the application.
Choosing the right framework/scripting technique helps in maintaining lower costs. The costs associated with test scripting are due to development and maintenance efforts. The approach of scripting used during test automation has effect on costs.
Various framework/scripting techniques are generally used:
- Linear (procedural code, possibly generated by tools like those that use record and playback)
- Structured (uses control structures - typically ‘if-else’, ‘switch’, ‘for’, ‘while’ conditions/ statements)
- Data-driven (data is persisted outside of tests in a database, spreadsheet, or other mechanism)
- Hybrid (two or more of the patterns above are used)
- Agile automation framework
The Testing framework is responsible for:[17]
- defining the format in which to express expectations
- creating a mechanism to hook into or drive the application under test
- executing the tests
- reporting results
Test automation interface[edit]
![Automated Software Testing Tools Automated Software Testing Tools](/uploads/1/2/3/7/123729261/857355918.png)
Test automation interface are platforms that provide a single workspace for incorporating multiple testing tools and frameworks for System/Integration testing of application under test. The goal of Test Automation Interface is to simplify the process of mapping tests to business criteria without coding coming in the way of the process. Test automation interface are expected to improve the efficiency and flexibility of maintaining test scripts.[18]
Test Automation Interface Model
Test Automation Interface consists of the following core modules:
- Interface Engine
- Interface Environment
- Object Repository
Interface engine[edit]
Interface engines are built on top of Interface Environment. Interface engine consists of a parser and a test runner. The parser is present to parse the object files coming from the object repository into the test specific scripting language. The test runner executes the test scripts using a test harness.[18]
Object repository[edit]
Object repositories are a collection of UI/Application object data recorded by the testing tool while exploring the application under test.[18]
Defining boundaries between automation framework and a testing tool[edit]
Tools are specifically designed to target some particular test environment, such as Windows and web automation tools, etc. Tools serve as a driving agent for an automation process. However, an automation framework is not a tool to perform a specific task, but rather infrastructure that provides the solution where different tools can do their job in a unified manner. This provides a common platform for the automation engineer.
There are various types of frameworks. They are categorized on the basis of the automation component they leverage. These are:
- Code-driven testing
What to test[edit]
Testing tools can help automate tasks such as product installation, test data creation, GUI interaction, problem detection (consider parsing or polling agents equipped with test oracles), defect logging, etc., without necessarily automating tests in an end-to-end fashion.
One must keep satisfying popular requirements when thinking of test automation:
- Platform and OS independence
- Data driven capability (Input Data, Output Data, Metadata)
- Customization Reporting (DB Data Base Access, Crystal Reports)
- Easy debugging and logging
- Version control friendly – minimal binary files
- Extensible & Customization (Open APIs to be able to integrate with other tools)
- Common Driver (For example, in the Java development ecosystem, that means Ant or Maven and the popular IDEs). This enables tests to integrate with the developers' workflows.
- Support unattended test runs for integration with build processes and batch runs. Continuous integration servers require this.
- Email Notifications like bounce messages
- Support distributed execution environment (distributed test bed)
- Distributed application support (distributed SUT)
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^Kolawa, Adam; Huizinga, Dorota (2007). Automated Defect Prevention: Best Practices in Software Management. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press. p. 74. ISBN978-0-470-04212-0.
- ^Proceedings from the 5th International Conference on Software Testing and Validation (ICST). Software Competence Center Hagenberg. 'Test Design: Lessons Learned and Practical Implications. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2008.4578383. ISBN978-0-7381-5746-7.
- ^Brian Marick. 'When Should a Test Be Automated?'. StickyMinds.com. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
- ^Garousi, Vahid; Mäntylä, Mika V. (2016-08-01). 'When and what to automate in software testing? A multi-vocal literature review'. Information and Software Technology. 76: 92–117. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.04.015.
- ^Learning Test-Driven Development by Counting Lines; Bas Vodde & Lasse Koskela; IEEE Software Vol. 24, Issue 3, 2007
- ^Testing APIs protects applications and reputations, by Amy Reichert, SearchSoftwareQuality March 2015
- ^All About API Testing: An Interview with Jonathan Cooper, by Cameron Philipp-Edmonds, Stickyminds August 19, 2014
- ^The Forrester Wave™ Evaluation Of Functional Test Automation (FTA) Is Out And It's All About Going Beyond GUI Testing, by Diego Lo Giudice, Forrester April 23, 2015
- ^Produce Better Software by Using a Layered Testing Strategy, by Sean Kenefick, Gartner January 7, 2014
- ^Part of the Pipeline: Why Continuous Testing Is Essential, by Adam Auerbach, TechWell Insights August 2015
- ^The Relationship between Risk and Continuous Testing: An Interview with Wayne Ariola, by Cameron Philipp-Edmonds, Stickyminds December 2015
- ^DevOps: Are You Pushing Bugs to Clients Faster, by Wayne Ariola and Cynthia Dunlop, PNSQC October 2015
- ^Headless Testing with Browsers; https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/gui-and-headless-browsers/
- ^Headless Testing with PhantomJS;http://phantomjs.org/headless-testing.html
- ^Automated User Interface Testing; https://www.devbridge.com/articles/automated-user-interface-testing/
- ^Testmunk. 'A Beginner's Guide to Automated Mobile App Testing | Testmunk Blog'. blog.testmunk.com. Retrieved 2015-09-17.
- ^'Selenium Meet-Up 4/20/2010 Elisabeth Hendrickson on Robot Framework 1of2'. Retrieved 2010-09-26.
- ^ abc'Conquest: Interface for Test Automation Design'(PDF). Retrieved 2011-12-11.
- Notes
- Elfriede Dustin; et al. (1999). Automated Software Testing. Addison Wesley. ISBN978-0-201-43287-9.
- Elfriede Dustin; et al. (2009). Implementing Automated Software Testing. Addison Wesley. ISBN978-0-321-58051-1.
- Mark Fewster & Dorothy Graham (1999). Software Test Automation. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley. ISBN978-0-201-33140-0.
- Roman Savenkov: How to Become a Software Tester. Roman Savenkov Consulting, 2008, ISBN978-0-615-23372-7
- Hong Zhu; et al. (2008). AST '08: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Automation of Software Test. ACM Press. ISBN978-1-60558-030-2.
- Mosley, Daniel J.; Posey, Bruce (2002). Just Enough Software Test Automation. ISBN978-0130084682.
- Hayes, Linda G., 'Automated Testing Handbook', Software Testing Institute, 2nd Edition, March 2004
- Kaner, Cem, 'Architectures of Test Automation', August 2000
External links[edit]
- Test Automation Snake Oil by James Bach
- When Should a Test Be Automated? by Brian Marick
- Success Factors for Keyword Driven Testing by Hans Buwalda
- Automation That Learns: Making Your Computer Work for You by Jeremy Carey-Dressler
- Automation Testing Resources & Best Practices by Joe Colantonio
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Test_automation&oldid=892858045'